Available on Google PlayApp Store

British Supreme Court rules Parliament must be given vote on

中文(简体) Public
<a href="http://www.liashop.net/" target="_blank">supreme 鍙扮仯瀹樼恫</a>姣忓ぉ鐐哄ぇ瀹跺付渚嗗叏鏂版疆娴佺郴鍒楀柈鍝侊紝鐐烘偍鐨勭敓娲绘坊鍔犳洿澶氱殑鑹插僵锛岀偤鎮ㄧ殑鐢熸椿鍏呮豢娲诲姏锛岃畵浣犳瘡澶╀笉閲嶈锛岀簿褰╃殑浜虹敓寰炵従鍦ㄩ枊濮嬶紝鏁珛闂滄敞鎴戝€憇upreme 鍙扮仯灏堟珒锛屾垜鍊戝皣鍏ㄦ柊鐨剆upreme澶波鍠搧灏囦竴涓€鍛堢従绲﹀ぇ瀹躲€?div class="intro">Investment manager Gina Miller speaks outside the British Supreme Cdg Hoodie 鍜宻upreme Court in London, Britain, Jan. 24, 2017. The British Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Prime Minister Theresa May must consult Parliament before trigg





<p></p>
<p>Investment manager Gina Miller speaks outside the British <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-sweater-a8aef74c/">Supreme Cdg Hoodie</a>鍜宻upreme Court in London, Britain, Jan. 24, 2017. The British Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Prime Minister Theresa May must consult Parliament before triggering formal negotiations on Britain leaving the European Union. (Xinhua/Han Yan) </p>
<p>LONDON, Jan. 24 (Xinhua) -- The British Prime Minister Theresa May can't trigger Britain's exit from the European Union without first getting the approval of the British Parliament, according to a <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-sweater-a8aef74c/">Supreme Box甯絋</a>鍜宻upreme Court ruling on Monday.</p>
<p>Judges in the Supreme Court in London ruled by a margin of eight to three in favor of a group of individuals who challenged the government's insistence that it could trigger the article 50 process to leave the EU.</p>
<p>It means MPs (members of the Parliament) will now be given a vote on a parliamentary bill before the process can start.</p>
<p>May was given 15 minutes advance notice of the decision before the president of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger.</p>
<p>Immediately after the case, the government's attorney general Jeremy Wright said although the government accepted the decision, it was disappointed by the ruling.</p>
<p>"We have the good fortune to live in a country where everyone, even government, is subject to the rule of law. So we will comply with the judgement," he said. "The government will comply and so all that is necessary to implement the decision."</p>
<p>Secretary of State for Exiting the EU, David Davis, will make a full statement later Tuesday in the House of Commons.</p>
<p>May and her advisers were locked in discussions at Number 10 to decide on their next steps.</p>
<p>An official spokeswoman for May said the government intended to press on with its intention to trigger article 50 by the end of March.</p>
<p>It is now widely accepted that the government will introduce a very short bill into the parliamentary process within days to seek approval to start the process.</p>
<p>A number of MPs have already indicated they will vote against the process in the House of Commons. The group of Scottish Nationalist Party MPs and a group of MPs from the main opposition Labor Party have already indicated they will oppose triggering article 50.</p>
<p>In the judgement Neuberger made it clear the court was not deciding on whether Britain should leave the EU, or what the timetable should be for the exit.</p>
<p>"The main issue is whether the government can trigger Article 50 without prior approval from an Act of Parliament. The government cannot exercise that power if it would change UK laws unless it is authorized to do so by Parliament," said the judgement.</p>
<p>The court also decided unanimously that government ministers are not legally compelled to consult the devolved parliaments in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.</p>
<p>Investment fund manager Gina Miller, who brought the case against the government, welcomed the decision outside the court.</p>
<p>"No prime minister, no government can expect to be unanswerable or unchallenged -- Parliament alone is sovereign. There's no doubt that Brexit is the most divisive issue of a generation but this case was about the legal process and not politics," she said.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Investment manager Gina Miller speaks outside the British Supreme Court in London, Britain, Jan. 24, 2017. The British Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Prime Minister Theresa May must consult Parliament before triggering formal negotiations on Britain leaving the European Union. (Xinhua/Han Yan) </p>
<p>LONDON, Jan. 24 (Xinhua) -- The British Prime Minister Theresa May can't trigger Britain's exit from the European Union without first getting the approval of the British Parliament, according to a Supreme Court ruling on Monday.</p>
<p>Judges in the Supreme Court in London ruled by a margin of eight to three in favor of a group of individuals who challenged the government's insistence that it could trigger the article 50 process to leave the EU.</p>
<p>It means MPs (members of the Parliament) will now be given a vote on a parliamentary bill before the process can start.</p>
<p>May was given 15 minutes advance notice of the decision before the president of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger.</p>
<p>Immediately after the case, the government's attorney general Jeremy Wright said although the government accepted the decision, it was disappointed by the ruling.</p>
<p>"We have the good fortune to live in a country where everyone, even government, is subject to the rule of law. So we will comply with the judgement," he said. "The government will comply and so all that is necessary to implement the decision."</p>
<p>Secretary of State for Exiting the EU, David Davis, will make a full statement later Tuesday in the House of Commons.</p>
<p>May and her advisers were locked in discussions at Number 10 to decide on their next steps.</p>
<p>An official spokeswoman for May said the government intended to press on with its intention to trigger article 50 by the end of March.</p>
<p>It is now widely accepted that the government will introduce a very short bill into the parliamentary process within days to seek approval to start the process.</p>
<p>A number of MPs have already indicated they will vote against the process in the House of Commons. The group of Scottish Nationalist Party MPs and a group of MPs from the main opposition Labor Party have already indicated they will oppose triggering article 50.</p>
<p>In the judgement Neuberger made it clear the court was not deciding on whether Britain should leave the EU, or what the timetable should be for the exit.</p>
<p>"The main issue is whether the government can trigger Article 50 without prior approval from an Act of Parliament. The government cannot exercise that power if it would change UK laws unless it is authorized to do so by Parliament," said the judgement.</p>
<p>The court also decided unanimously that government ministers are not legally compelled to consult the devolved parliaments in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.</p>
<p>Investment fund manager Gina Miller, who brought the case against the government, welcomed the decision outside the court.</p>
<p>"No prime minister, no government can expect to be unanswerable or unchallenged -- Parliament alone is sovereign. There's no doubt that Brexit is the most divisive issue of a generation but this case was about the legal process and not politics," she said.</p>




鎯宠浜嗚В鏇村闂滄柤<a href="http://www.liashop.net/lc/supreme-shorts/" target="_blank">supreme 鐭げ</a>璩囪▕娑堟伅鐨勬湅鍙嬶紝涓嶅Θ闂滄敞<a href="http://www.liashop.net/" target="_blank">supreme 鍙扮仯灏堟珒</a>寰岀簩鐨勫牨閬撴秷鎭紝涔熷彲浠ユ坊鍔?strong style="color: red;">Line锛歍WDK</strong>閫茶鍜ㄨ銆傚叏鍫存墍鏈夋柊鍝佷綆鑷?鎶樿捣锛屾柊娆句笉鏂蜂笂鏋讹紝閫辨棩閫辨湯璩肩墿鏇存槸浜湁灏堝爆鎶樻墸鍎儬锛岄鍠滈€i€o紝姝e搧澶波锛屾敮鎸佸皥娅冮璀夛紝7澶╅憭璩炴湡锛?澶╃劇鐞嗙敱閫€鎻涜波锛屽績鍕曪紝涓嶅琛屽嫊锛岃稌绶婁締閬歌臣鍚э紒锛?a href="http://www.liashop.net/" target="_blank">http://www.liashop.net/</a>;锛?

Vocabulary List

  •  
     
    0
British Supreme Court rules Parliament must be given vote on
0 vocabularies