U.S. Supreme Court allows Trump's revised travel ban in part (2)
中文(简体) Public
<a href="http://www.liashop.net/" target="_blank">supreme 鍙扮仯瀹樼恫</a>姣忓ぉ鐐哄ぇ瀹跺付渚嗗叏鏂版疆娴佺郴鍒楀柈鍝侊紝鐐烘偍鐨勭敓娲绘坊鍔犳洿澶氱殑鑹插僵锛岀偤鎮ㄧ殑鐢熸椿鍏呮豢娲诲姏锛岃畵浣犳瘡澶╀笉閲嶈锛岀簿褰╃殑浜虹敓寰炵従鍦ㄩ枊濮嬶紝鏁珛闂滄敞鎴戝€憇upreme 鍙扮仯灏堟珒锛屾垜鍊戝皣鍏ㄦ柊鐨剆upreme澶波鍠搧灏囦竴涓€鍛堢従绲﹀ぇ瀹躲€?div class="intro">File photo taken on May 15, 2017 shows people protest outside as the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals prepares to hear arguments on US President Donald Trump's revisedtravel ban in Seattle, the U.S. state of Washington. (Xinhua/AFP PHOTO) WA
<p></p>
<p>File photo taken on May 15, 2017 shows people protest outside as the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals prepares to hear arguments on US President Donald Trump's revisedtravel ban in Seattle, the U.S. state of Washington. (Xinhua/AFP PHOTO) </p>
<p>WASHINGTON, June 26 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-pants-766adfc3/">Supreme 灏堣常搴?/a>鍜孲upreme Court on Monday announced that it has decided to allow President Donald Trump's controversial revised travel ban to go into effect in most instances and will review it in fall.</p>
<p>The decision, immediately seen as Trump's partial victory, blocks the actions of lower federal courts that had put the president's executive order barring U.S. entry from six majority-Muslim countries in the Middle East and Africa completely on hold.</p>
<p>As a result, people who do not have a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States would be denied entry once the order takes effect within 72 hours. Those who can show they have a relationship to a person or entity will be allowed to enter the United States.</p>
<p>Denying entry to a person that does not have a relationship to a person or entity in the United States "does not burden any American party by reason of that party's relationship with the foreign national. And the courts below did not conclude that exclusion in such circumstances would impose any legally relevant hardship for the foreign national himself," the court said.</p>
<p>Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, along with the newest Justice Neil Gorsuch, Trump's nominee to the court earlier this year, wanted to lift the entire ban, according to the order.</p>
<p>The issue has been a big legal controversy in the first five months of Trump's presidency since his original order signed on Jan. 27 sparked widespread protests days after he was sworn in.</p>
<p>The case is at the <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-pants-9a5119f7/">Supreme 浼戦枓瑜?/a>鍜孲upreme Court because two federal appeal courts, the 4th and 9th Circuit courts, have ruled against the Trump travel policy, which would impose a 90-day pause in travel from citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.</p>
<p>The 4th Circuit based in Richmond, Virginia, said Trump's order discriminated against Muslims.</p>
<p>The 9th Circuit in San Francisco ruled on immigration law, saying Trump's order failed to provide the required justification under the Immigration and Nationality Act for suspending the entry of more than 180 million people on the basis of nationality.</p>
<p>"We continue to be confident that the president's executive order to protect our country is fully lawful and ultimately will be upheld at the Supreme Court," White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer defended Trump's travel ban after the two federal appeal courts' ruling.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court will hear the case when it returns for the fall term, which begins the first Monday in October. Arguments have not yet been scheduled.</p>
<p>Monday is the final day of the Supreme Court's term. </p>
<p></p>
<p>File photo taken on May 15, 2017 shows people protest outside as the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals prepares to hear arguments on US President Donald Trump's revisedtravel ban in Seattle, the U.S. state of Washington. (Xinhua/AFP PHOTO) </p>
<p>WASHINGTON, June 26 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday announced that it has decided to allow President Donald Trump's controversial revised travel ban to go into effect in most instances and will review it in fall.</p>
<p>The decision, immediately seen as Trump's partial victory, blocks the actions of lower federal courts that had put the president's executive order barring U.S. entry from six majority-Muslim countries in the Middle East and Africa completely on hold.</p>
<p>As a result, people who do not have a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States would be denied entry once the order takes effect within 72 hours. Those who can show they have a relationship to a person or entity will be allowed to enter the United States.</p>
<p>Denying entry to a person that does not have a relationship to a person or entity in the United States "does not burden any American party by reason of that party's relationship with the foreign national. And the courts below did not conclude that exclusion in such circumstances would impose any legally relevant hardship for the foreign national himself," the court said.</p>
<p>Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, along with the newest Justice Neil Gorsuch, Trump's nominee to the court earlier this year, wanted to lift the entire ban, according to the order.</p>
<p>The issue has been a big legal controversy in the first five months of Trump's presidency since his original order signed on Jan. 27 sparked widespread protests days after he was sworn in.</p>
<p>The case is at the Supreme Court because two federal appeal courts, the 4th and 9th Circuit courts, have ruled against the Trump travel policy, which would impose a 90-day pause in travel from citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.</p>
<p>The 4th Circuit based in Richmond, Virginia, said Trump's order discriminated against Muslims.</p>
<p>The 9th Circuit in San Francisco ruled on immigration law, saying Trump's order failed to provide the required justification under the Immigration and Nationality Act for suspending the entry of more than 180 million people on the basis of nationality.</p>
<p>"We continue to be confident that the president's executive order to protect our country is fully lawful and ultimately will be upheld at the Supreme Court," White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer defended Trump's travel ban after the two federal appeal courts' ruling.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court will hear the case when it returns for the fall term, which begins the first Monday in October. Arguments have not yet been scheduled.</p>
<p>Monday is the final day of the Supreme Court's term. </p>
鎯宠浜嗚В鏇村闂滄柤<a href="http://www.liashop.net/lc/supreme-crossbody-bag/" target="_blank">supreme 鎸庡寘</a>璩囪▕娑堟伅鐨勬湅鍙嬶紝涓嶅Θ闂滄敞<a href="http://www.liashop.net/" target="_blank">supreme 鍙扮仯灏堟珒</a>寰岀簩鐨勫牨閬撴秷鎭紝涔熷彲浠ユ坊鍔?strong style="color: red;">Line锛歍WDK</strong>閫茶鍜ㄨ銆傚叏鍫存墍鏈夋柊鍝佷綆鑷?鎶樿捣锛屾柊娆句笉鏂蜂笂鏋讹紝閫辨棩閫辨湯璩肩墿鏇存槸浜湁灏堝爆鎶樻墸鍎儬锛岄鍠滈€ｉ€ｏ紝姝ｅ搧澶波锛屾敮鎸佸皥娅冮璀夛紝7澶╅憭璩炴湡锛?澶╃劇鐞嗙敱閫€鎻涜波锛屽績鍕曪紝涓嶅琛屽嫊锛岃稌绶婁締閬歌臣鍚э紒锛?a href="http://www.liashop.net/" target="_blank">http://www.liashop.net/</a>;锛?
<p></p>
<p>File photo taken on May 15, 2017 shows people protest outside as the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals prepares to hear arguments on US President Donald Trump's revisedtravel ban in Seattle, the U.S. state of Washington. (Xinhua/AFP PHOTO) </p>
<p>WASHINGTON, June 26 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-pants-766adfc3/">Supreme 灏堣常搴?/a>鍜孲upreme Court on Monday announced that it has decided to allow President Donald Trump's controversial revised travel ban to go into effect in most instances and will review it in fall.</p>
<p>The decision, immediately seen as Trump's partial victory, blocks the actions of lower federal courts that had put the president's executive order barring U.S. entry from six majority-Muslim countries in the Middle East and Africa completely on hold.</p>
<p>As a result, people who do not have a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States would be denied entry once the order takes effect within 72 hours. Those who can show they have a relationship to a person or entity will be allowed to enter the United States.</p>
<p>Denying entry to a person that does not have a relationship to a person or entity in the United States "does not burden any American party by reason of that party's relationship with the foreign national. And the courts below did not conclude that exclusion in such circumstances would impose any legally relevant hardship for the foreign national himself," the court said.</p>
<p>Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, along with the newest Justice Neil Gorsuch, Trump's nominee to the court earlier this year, wanted to lift the entire ban, according to the order.</p>
<p>The issue has been a big legal controversy in the first five months of Trump's presidency since his original order signed on Jan. 27 sparked widespread protests days after he was sworn in.</p>
<p>The case is at the <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-pants-9a5119f7/">Supreme 浼戦枓瑜?/a>鍜孲upreme Court because two federal appeal courts, the 4th and 9th Circuit courts, have ruled against the Trump travel policy, which would impose a 90-day pause in travel from citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.</p>
<p>The 4th Circuit based in Richmond, Virginia, said Trump's order discriminated against Muslims.</p>
<p>The 9th Circuit in San Francisco ruled on immigration law, saying Trump's order failed to provide the required justification under the Immigration and Nationality Act for suspending the entry of more than 180 million people on the basis of nationality.</p>
<p>"We continue to be confident that the president's executive order to protect our country is fully lawful and ultimately will be upheld at the Supreme Court," White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer defended Trump's travel ban after the two federal appeal courts' ruling.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court will hear the case when it returns for the fall term, which begins the first Monday in October. Arguments have not yet been scheduled.</p>
<p>Monday is the final day of the Supreme Court's term. </p>
<p></p>
<p>File photo taken on May 15, 2017 shows people protest outside as the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals prepares to hear arguments on US President Donald Trump's revisedtravel ban in Seattle, the U.S. state of Washington. (Xinhua/AFP PHOTO) </p>
<p>WASHINGTON, June 26 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday announced that it has decided to allow President Donald Trump's controversial revised travel ban to go into effect in most instances and will review it in fall.</p>
<p>The decision, immediately seen as Trump's partial victory, blocks the actions of lower federal courts that had put the president's executive order barring U.S. entry from six majority-Muslim countries in the Middle East and Africa completely on hold.</p>
<p>As a result, people who do not have a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States would be denied entry once the order takes effect within 72 hours. Those who can show they have a relationship to a person or entity will be allowed to enter the United States.</p>
<p>Denying entry to a person that does not have a relationship to a person or entity in the United States "does not burden any American party by reason of that party's relationship with the foreign national. And the courts below did not conclude that exclusion in such circumstances would impose any legally relevant hardship for the foreign national himself," the court said.</p>
<p>Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, along with the newest Justice Neil Gorsuch, Trump's nominee to the court earlier this year, wanted to lift the entire ban, according to the order.</p>
<p>The issue has been a big legal controversy in the first five months of Trump's presidency since his original order signed on Jan. 27 sparked widespread protests days after he was sworn in.</p>
<p>The case is at the Supreme Court because two federal appeal courts, the 4th and 9th Circuit courts, have ruled against the Trump travel policy, which would impose a 90-day pause in travel from citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.</p>
<p>The 4th Circuit based in Richmond, Virginia, said Trump's order discriminated against Muslims.</p>
<p>The 9th Circuit in San Francisco ruled on immigration law, saying Trump's order failed to provide the required justification under the Immigration and Nationality Act for suspending the entry of more than 180 million people on the basis of nationality.</p>
<p>"We continue to be confident that the president's executive order to protect our country is fully lawful and ultimately will be upheld at the Supreme Court," White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer defended Trump's travel ban after the two federal appeal courts' ruling.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court will hear the case when it returns for the fall term, which begins the first Monday in October. Arguments have not yet been scheduled.</p>
<p>Monday is the final day of the Supreme Court's term. </p>
鎯宠浜嗚В鏇村闂滄柤<a href="http://www.liashop.net/lc/supreme-crossbody-bag/" target="_blank">supreme 鎸庡寘</a>璩囪▕娑堟伅鐨勬湅鍙嬶紝涓嶅Θ闂滄敞<a href="http://www.liashop.net/" target="_blank">supreme 鍙扮仯灏堟珒</a>寰岀簩鐨勫牨閬撴秷鎭紝涔熷彲浠ユ坊鍔?strong style="color: red;">Line锛歍WDK</strong>閫茶鍜ㄨ銆傚叏鍫存墍鏈夋柊鍝佷綆鑷?鎶樿捣锛屾柊娆句笉鏂蜂笂鏋讹紝閫辨棩閫辨湯璩肩墿鏇存槸浜湁灏堝爆鎶樻墸鍎儬锛岄鍠滈€ｉ€ｏ紝姝ｅ搧澶波锛屾敮鎸佸皥娅冮璀夛紝7澶╅憭璩炴湡锛?澶╃劇鐞嗙敱閫€鎻涜波锛屽績鍕曪紝涓嶅琛屽嫊锛岃稌绶婁締閬歌臣鍚э紒锛?a href="http://www.liashop.net/" target="_blank">http://www.liashop.net/</a>;锛?
by jmj42520533
Vocabulary List
- 0
