U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of affirmative action prog
中文(简体) Public
<a href="http://www.liashop.net/">supreme 鍙扮仯瀹樼恫</a>姣忓ぉ鐐哄ぇ瀹跺付渚嗗叏鏂版疆娴佺郴鍒楀柈鍝侊紝鐐烘偍鐨勭敓娲绘坊鍔犳洿澶氱殑鑹插僵锛岀偤鎮ㄧ殑鐢熸椿鍏呮豢娲诲姏锛岃畵鎮ㄦ瘡澶╀笉閲嶈锛岀簿褰╃殑浜虹敓寰炵従鍦ㄩ枊濮嬶紝鏁珛闂滄敞鎴戝€憇upreme 鍙扮仯灏堟珒锛屾垜鍊戝皣鍏ㄦ柊鐨剆upreme澶波鍠搧涓€涓€鍛堢従绲﹀ぇ瀹躲€?div class="intro">Asian-American demonstrators protest outside the Supreme Online Store 鍜孲upreme Court as theaffirmative action in university admissions case was being heard by the court in Washington, December 9, 2015. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque WASHINGTON, J
<p></p>
<p>Asian-American demonstrators protest outside the <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-tee-90c8804c/">Supreme Online Store</a>鍜孲upreme Court as theaffirmative action in university admissions case was being heard by the court in Washington, December 9, 2015. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque</p>
<p>WASHINGTON, June 23 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-tee-1b4931f5/">Supreme 绱呰壊T鎭?/a>鍜孲upreme Court on Thursday upheld an affirmative action program at the University of Texas that takes race into consideration when issuing admissions.</p>
<p>By voting 4-3, the Supreme Court gave the university the greenlight to continue its race-conscious admission program but urged the university to continue the review of its admission program.</p>
<p>"The Court's affirmance of the University's admissions policy today does not necessarily mean the University may rely on that same policy without refinement," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote on behalf of the majority.</p>
<p>"It is the University's ongoing obligation to engage in constant deliberation and continued reflection regarding its admissions policies," wrote Justice Kennedy.</p>
<p>It was the second time the Supreme Court heard the case filed by plaintiff Abigail Fisher, a white woman from Texas who said the university had denied her admission in 2008 because of her race.</p>
<p>Under the University of Texas's admission program, the top 10 percent of students in every high school in the state are guaranteed admission to the university. To fill the remaining places, the university selects students under standards which include race and ethnicity.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Demonstrators take part in a rally at the U.S. Supreme Court as theaffirmative action in university admissions case was being heard at the court in Washington December 9, 2015. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque</p>
<p>The ruling came about four months after the sudden death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who during oral arguments last December questioned whether admitting more black students would eventually benefit those students.</p>
<p>"They (black scientists) come from lesser schools where they do not feel that they're being pushed ahead in classes that are too fast for them," said Scalia. "I don't think it stands to reason that it's a good thing for the University of Texas to admit as many blacks as possible."</p>
<p>Justice Elena Kagan did not participate in the voting, recusing herself because she worked on the case as U.S. solicitor general before joining the Supreme Court in 2010. </p>
<p></p>
<p>Asian-American demonstrators protest outside the Supreme Court as theaffirmative action in university admissions case was being heard by the court in Washington, December 9, 2015. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque</p>
<p>WASHINGTON, June 23 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday upheld an affirmative action program at the University of Texas that takes race into consideration when issuing admissions.</p>
<p>By voting 4-3, the Supreme Court gave the university the greenlight to continue its race-conscious admission program but urged the university to continue the review of its admission program.</p>
<p>"The Court's affirmance of the University's admissions policy today does not necessarily mean the University may rely on that same policy without refinement," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote on behalf of the majority.</p>
<p>"It is the University's ongoing obligation to engage in constant deliberation and continued reflection regarding its admissions policies," wrote Justice Kennedy.</p>
<p>It was the second time the Supreme Court heard the case filed by plaintiff Abigail Fisher, a white woman from Texas who said the university had denied her admission in 2008 because of her race.</p>
<p>Under the University of Texas's admission program, the top 10 percent of students in every high school in the state are guaranteed admission to the university. To fill the remaining places, the university selects students under standards which include race and ethnicity.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Demonstrators take part in a rally at the U.S. Supreme Court as theaffirmative action in university admissions case was being heard at the court in Washington December 9, 2015. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque</p>
<p>The ruling came about four months after the sudden death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who during oral arguments last December questioned whether admitting more black students would eventually benefit those students.</p>
<p>"They (black scientists) come from lesser schools where they do not feel that they're being pushed ahead in classes that are too fast for them," said Scalia. "I don't think it stands to reason that it's a good thing for the University of Texas to admit as many blacks as possible."</p>
<p>Justice Elena Kagan did not participate in the voting, recusing herself because she worked on the case as U.S. solicitor general before joining the Supreme Court in 2010. </p>
鎯宠浜嗚В鏇村闂滄柤<a href="http://www.liashop.net/">supreme 浠ｈ臣</a>璩囪▕娑堟伅鐨勬湅鍙嬶紝涓嶅Θ闂滄敞<a href="http://www.liashop.net/">supreme 鍙扮仯灏堟珒</a>寰岀簩鐨勫牨閬撴秷鎭紝涔熷彲浠ユ坊鍔?strong style="color: red;">Line锛歍WDK</strong>閫茶鍜ㄨ銆傚叏鍫存墍鏈夋柊鍝佷綆鑷?鎶樿捣锛屾柊娆句笉鏂蜂笂鏋讹紝閫辨棩閫辨湯璩肩墿鏇存槸浜湁灏堝爆鎶樻墸鍎儬锛岄鍠滈€ｉ€ｏ紝姝ｅ搧澶波锛屾敮鎸佸皥娅冮璀夛紝7澶╅憭璩炴湡锛?澶╃劇鐞嗙敱閫€鎻涜波锛屽績鍕曪紝涓嶅琛屽嫊锛岃稌绶婁締閬歌臣鍚э紒锛?a href="http://www.liashop.net/">http://www.liashop.net/</a>;锛?
<p></p>
<p>Asian-American demonstrators protest outside the <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-tee-90c8804c/">Supreme Online Store</a>鍜孲upreme Court as theaffirmative action in university admissions case was being heard by the court in Washington, December 9, 2015. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque</p>
<p>WASHINGTON, June 23 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-tee-1b4931f5/">Supreme 绱呰壊T鎭?/a>鍜孲upreme Court on Thursday upheld an affirmative action program at the University of Texas that takes race into consideration when issuing admissions.</p>
<p>By voting 4-3, the Supreme Court gave the university the greenlight to continue its race-conscious admission program but urged the university to continue the review of its admission program.</p>
<p>"The Court's affirmance of the University's admissions policy today does not necessarily mean the University may rely on that same policy without refinement," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote on behalf of the majority.</p>
<p>"It is the University's ongoing obligation to engage in constant deliberation and continued reflection regarding its admissions policies," wrote Justice Kennedy.</p>
<p>It was the second time the Supreme Court heard the case filed by plaintiff Abigail Fisher, a white woman from Texas who said the university had denied her admission in 2008 because of her race.</p>
<p>Under the University of Texas's admission program, the top 10 percent of students in every high school in the state are guaranteed admission to the university. To fill the remaining places, the university selects students under standards which include race and ethnicity.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Demonstrators take part in a rally at the U.S. Supreme Court as theaffirmative action in university admissions case was being heard at the court in Washington December 9, 2015. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque</p>
<p>The ruling came about four months after the sudden death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who during oral arguments last December questioned whether admitting more black students would eventually benefit those students.</p>
<p>"They (black scientists) come from lesser schools where they do not feel that they're being pushed ahead in classes that are too fast for them," said Scalia. "I don't think it stands to reason that it's a good thing for the University of Texas to admit as many blacks as possible."</p>
<p>Justice Elena Kagan did not participate in the voting, recusing herself because she worked on the case as U.S. solicitor general before joining the Supreme Court in 2010. </p>
<p></p>
<p>Asian-American demonstrators protest outside the Supreme Court as theaffirmative action in university admissions case was being heard by the court in Washington, December 9, 2015. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque</p>
<p>WASHINGTON, June 23 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday upheld an affirmative action program at the University of Texas that takes race into consideration when issuing admissions.</p>
<p>By voting 4-3, the Supreme Court gave the university the greenlight to continue its race-conscious admission program but urged the university to continue the review of its admission program.</p>
<p>"The Court's affirmance of the University's admissions policy today does not necessarily mean the University may rely on that same policy without refinement," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote on behalf of the majority.</p>
<p>"It is the University's ongoing obligation to engage in constant deliberation and continued reflection regarding its admissions policies," wrote Justice Kennedy.</p>
<p>It was the second time the Supreme Court heard the case filed by plaintiff Abigail Fisher, a white woman from Texas who said the university had denied her admission in 2008 because of her race.</p>
<p>Under the University of Texas's admission program, the top 10 percent of students in every high school in the state are guaranteed admission to the university. To fill the remaining places, the university selects students under standards which include race and ethnicity.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Demonstrators take part in a rally at the U.S. Supreme Court as theaffirmative action in university admissions case was being heard at the court in Washington December 9, 2015. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque</p>
<p>The ruling came about four months after the sudden death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who during oral arguments last December questioned whether admitting more black students would eventually benefit those students.</p>
<p>"They (black scientists) come from lesser schools where they do not feel that they're being pushed ahead in classes that are too fast for them," said Scalia. "I don't think it stands to reason that it's a good thing for the University of Texas to admit as many blacks as possible."</p>
<p>Justice Elena Kagan did not participate in the voting, recusing herself because she worked on the case as U.S. solicitor general before joining the Supreme Court in 2010. </p>
鎯宠浜嗚В鏇村闂滄柤<a href="http://www.liashop.net/">supreme 浠ｈ臣</a>璩囪▕娑堟伅鐨勬湅鍙嬶紝涓嶅Θ闂滄敞<a href="http://www.liashop.net/">supreme 鍙扮仯灏堟珒</a>寰岀簩鐨勫牨閬撴秷鎭紝涔熷彲浠ユ坊鍔?strong style="color: red;">Line锛歍WDK</strong>閫茶鍜ㄨ銆傚叏鍫存墍鏈夋柊鍝佷綆鑷?鎶樿捣锛屾柊娆句笉鏂蜂笂鏋讹紝閫辨棩閫辨湯璩肩墿鏇存槸浜湁灏堝爆鎶樻墸鍎儬锛岄鍠滈€ｉ€ｏ紝姝ｅ搧澶波锛屾敮鎸佸皥娅冮璀夛紝7澶╅憭璩炴湡锛?澶╃劇鐞嗙敱閫€鎻涜波锛屽績鍕曪紝涓嶅琛屽嫊锛岃稌绶婁締閬歌臣鍚э紒锛?a href="http://www.liashop.net/">http://www.liashop.net/</a>;锛?
by hwitka
Vocabulary List
- 0
