Michael Jordan partly wins trademark lawsuit
中文(简体) Public
<a href="http://www.liashop.net/
">supreme 鍙扮仯瀹樼恫</a>瀹樼恫姣忓ぉ鐐哄ぇ瀹跺付渚嗗叏鏂版疆娴佺郴鍒楀柈鍝侊紝鐐烘偍鐨勭敓娲绘坊鍔犳洿澶氱殑鑹插僵锛岀偤鎮ㄧ殑鐢熸椿鍏呮豢娲诲姏锛岃畵鎮ㄦ瘡澶╀笉閲嶈锛岀簿褰╃殑浜虹敓寰炵従鍦ㄩ枊濮嬶紝鏁珛闂滄敞鎴戝€慡upreme鍙扮仯瀹樼恫锛屾垜鍊戝皣鍏ㄦ柊鐨凷upreme澶波鍠搧浠ュ強閬嬪嫊璩囪▕灏囦竴涓€鍛堢従绲﹀ぇ瀹躲€?div class="intro">BEIJING, Dec. 8 (Xinhua) -- The Supreme闃叉按琚?018 鍙奡upreme People's Court (SPC) Thursday issued a ruling that favored part of the claims lodged by U.S. basketball icon Michael Jordan against a Chinese firm and the trademark authority.
<p>BEIJING, Dec. 8 (Xinhua) -- The <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-other-41a72d4a/">Supreme闃叉按琚?018</a>鍙奡upreme People's Court (SPC) Thursday issued a ruling that favored part of the claims lodged by U.S. basketball icon Michael Jordan against a Chinese firm and the trademark authority.</p>
<p>The court ruled that the trademark in dispute, "Qiaodan," the Chinese translation for Jordan, violated Jordan's right to his name and broke provisions in the Trademark Law.</p>
<p>Registration of the "Qiaodan" trademark will also be revoked.</p>
<p>The court also ruled that Jordan has no exclusive rights to the use of the alphabetic spelling of "Qiaodan," which is the pinyin (phonetic spelling) of the Chinese characters, and rejected his claims in this regard.</p>
<p>The SPC in April started an open retrial of the trademark dispute cases filed by Jordan.</p>
<p>In 2012, Michael Jordan accused Qiaodan Sports, a Chinese sportswear and shoe manufacturer, of unauthorized use of his name and identity.</p>
<p>Jordan lodged an appeal to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry Commerce to revoke the trademarks in dispute, but this was rejected.</p>
<p>Later, Jordan filed lawsuits against the adjudication of the trademark authority but lost.</p>
<p>Chinese courts originally upheld the adjudication on the grounds that the Chinese translation "Qiaodan" is the translation of a common family name, and does not necessarily refer to the basketballer's name only.</p>
<p>In 2015, Jordan appealed to the SPC. The SPC accepted the appeal on the basis of the Administrative Procedural Law.</p>
<p>The SPC's ruling Thursday said both the trademark authority's adjudication and the previous court decisions against Jordan's legitimate trademark claims should also be revoked.</p>
<p>However, original court rulings regarding the pinyin part were upheld by the SPC.</p>
<p>Tao Kaiyuan, the chief justice of the trial at SPC, said the SPC believes that there is sufficient evidence to prove that "Qiaodan" as the Chinese translation for Jordan is famous in China and is familiar to the Chinese public.</p>
<p>Also, the Chinese characters "Qiaodan" are often used by Chinese public when referring to the former American basketball player, and there is already a "stable" link between the name and the specific individual, facts that entitle Jordan to protection under the Trademark Law.</p>
<p>Journalists from both domestic and overseas news organizations, representatives of the parties involved and members of the public were present at the announcement of the court ruling on Thursday.</p>
<p>The full text of the ruling will be published online. </p>
<p>BEIJING, Dec. 8 (Xinhua) -- The <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-other-41a72d4a/">Supreme 鏀剁磵琚?/a>鍙奡upreme People's Court (SPC) Thursday issued a ruling that favored part of the claims lodged by U.S. basketball icon Michael Jordan against a Chinese firm and the trademark authority.</p>
<p>The court ruled that the trademark in dispute, "Qiaodan," the Chinese translation for Jordan, violated Jordan's right to his name and broke provisions in the Trademark Law.</p>
<p>Registration of the "Qiaodan" trademark will also be revoked.</p>
<p>The court also ruled that Jordan has no exclusive rights to the use of the alphabetic spelling of "Qiaodan," which is the pinyin (phonetic spelling) of the Chinese characters, and rejected his claims in this regard.</p>
<p>The SPC in April started an open retrial of the trademark dispute cases filed by Jordan.</p>
<p>In 2012, Michael Jordan accused Qiaodan Sports, a Chinese sportswear and shoe manufacturer, of unauthorized use of his name and identity.</p>
<p>Jordan lodged an appeal to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry Commerce to revoke the trademarks in dispute, but this was rejected.</p>
<p>Later, Jordan filed lawsuits against the adjudication of the trademark authority but lost.</p>
<p>Chinese courts originally upheld the adjudication on the grounds that the Chinese translation "Qiaodan" is the translation of a common family name, and does not necessarily refer to the basketballer's name only.</p>
<p>In 2015, Jordan appealed to the SPC. The SPC accepted the appeal on the basis of the Administrative Procedural Law.</p>
<p>The SPC's ruling Thursday said both the trademark authority's adjudication and the previous court decisions against Jordan's legitimate trademark claims should also be revoked.</p>
<p>However, original court rulings regarding the pinyin part were upheld by the SPC.</p>
<p>Tao Kaiyuan, the chief justice of the trial at SPC, said the SPC believes that there is sufficient evidence to prove that "Qiaodan" as the Chinese translation for Jordan is famous in China and is familiar to the Chinese public.</p>
<p>Also, the Chinese characters "Qiaodan" are often used by Chinese public when referring to the former American basketball player, and there is already a "stable" link between the name and the specific individual, facts that entitle Jordan to protection under the Trademark Law.</p>
<p>Journalists from both domestic and overseas news organizations, representatives of the parties involved and members of the public were present at the announcement of the court ruling on Thursday.</p>
<p>The full text of the ruling will be published online. </p>
鎯宠浜嗚В鏇村闂滄柤<a href="http://www.liashop.net/lc/supreme-clothes/
">supreme 琛ｆ湇</a>璩囪▕娑堟伅鐨勬湅鍙嬶紝涓嶅Θ闂滄敞<a href="http://www.liashop.net/
">supreme 鍙扮仯灏堟珒</a>寰岀簩鐨勫牨閬撴秷鎭紝涔熷彲浠ユ坊鍔?strong style="color:red;">Line锛歍WZO</strong>閫茶鍜ㄨ銆傚叏鍫存墍鏈夋柊鍝佷綆鑷?鎶樿捣锛屾柊娆句笉鏂蜂笂鏋讹紝閫辨棩閫辨湯璩肩墿鏇存槸浜湁灏堝爆鎶樻墸鍎儬锛岄鍠滈€ｉ€ｏ紝姝ｅ搧澶波锛屾敮鎸佸皥娅冮璀夛紝7澶╅憭璩炴湡锛?澶╃劇鐞嗙敱閫€鎻涜波锛屽績鍕曪紝涓嶅琛屽嫊锛岃稌绶婁締閬歌臣鍚э紒锛?a href="http://www.liashop.net">http://www.liashop.net</a>;锛?
">supreme 鍙扮仯瀹樼恫</a>瀹樼恫姣忓ぉ鐐哄ぇ瀹跺付渚嗗叏鏂版疆娴佺郴鍒楀柈鍝侊紝鐐烘偍鐨勭敓娲绘坊鍔犳洿澶氱殑鑹插僵锛岀偤鎮ㄧ殑鐢熸椿鍏呮豢娲诲姏锛岃畵鎮ㄦ瘡澶╀笉閲嶈锛岀簿褰╃殑浜虹敓寰炵従鍦ㄩ枊濮嬶紝鏁珛闂滄敞鎴戝€慡upreme鍙扮仯瀹樼恫锛屾垜鍊戝皣鍏ㄦ柊鐨凷upreme澶波鍠搧浠ュ強閬嬪嫊璩囪▕灏囦竴涓€鍛堢従绲﹀ぇ瀹躲€?div class="intro">BEIJING, Dec. 8 (Xinhua) -- The Supreme闃叉按琚?018 鍙奡upreme People's Court (SPC) Thursday issued a ruling that favored part of the claims lodged by U.S. basketball icon Michael Jordan against a Chinese firm and the trademark authority.
<p>BEIJING, Dec. 8 (Xinhua) -- The <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-other-41a72d4a/">Supreme闃叉按琚?018</a>鍙奡upreme People's Court (SPC) Thursday issued a ruling that favored part of the claims lodged by U.S. basketball icon Michael Jordan against a Chinese firm and the trademark authority.</p>
<p>The court ruled that the trademark in dispute, "Qiaodan," the Chinese translation for Jordan, violated Jordan's right to his name and broke provisions in the Trademark Law.</p>
<p>Registration of the "Qiaodan" trademark will also be revoked.</p>
<p>The court also ruled that Jordan has no exclusive rights to the use of the alphabetic spelling of "Qiaodan," which is the pinyin (phonetic spelling) of the Chinese characters, and rejected his claims in this regard.</p>
<p>The SPC in April started an open retrial of the trademark dispute cases filed by Jordan.</p>
<p>In 2012, Michael Jordan accused Qiaodan Sports, a Chinese sportswear and shoe manufacturer, of unauthorized use of his name and identity.</p>
<p>Jordan lodged an appeal to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry Commerce to revoke the trademarks in dispute, but this was rejected.</p>
<p>Later, Jordan filed lawsuits against the adjudication of the trademark authority but lost.</p>
<p>Chinese courts originally upheld the adjudication on the grounds that the Chinese translation "Qiaodan" is the translation of a common family name, and does not necessarily refer to the basketballer's name only.</p>
<p>In 2015, Jordan appealed to the SPC. The SPC accepted the appeal on the basis of the Administrative Procedural Law.</p>
<p>The SPC's ruling Thursday said both the trademark authority's adjudication and the previous court decisions against Jordan's legitimate trademark claims should also be revoked.</p>
<p>However, original court rulings regarding the pinyin part were upheld by the SPC.</p>
<p>Tao Kaiyuan, the chief justice of the trial at SPC, said the SPC believes that there is sufficient evidence to prove that "Qiaodan" as the Chinese translation for Jordan is famous in China and is familiar to the Chinese public.</p>
<p>Also, the Chinese characters "Qiaodan" are often used by Chinese public when referring to the former American basketball player, and there is already a "stable" link between the name and the specific individual, facts that entitle Jordan to protection under the Trademark Law.</p>
<p>Journalists from both domestic and overseas news organizations, representatives of the parties involved and members of the public were present at the announcement of the court ruling on Thursday.</p>
<p>The full text of the ruling will be published online. </p>
<p>BEIJING, Dec. 8 (Xinhua) -- The <a href="http://www.liashop.net/lp/supreme-other-41a72d4a/">Supreme 鏀剁磵琚?/a>鍙奡upreme People's Court (SPC) Thursday issued a ruling that favored part of the claims lodged by U.S. basketball icon Michael Jordan against a Chinese firm and the trademark authority.</p>
<p>The court ruled that the trademark in dispute, "Qiaodan," the Chinese translation for Jordan, violated Jordan's right to his name and broke provisions in the Trademark Law.</p>
<p>Registration of the "Qiaodan" trademark will also be revoked.</p>
<p>The court also ruled that Jordan has no exclusive rights to the use of the alphabetic spelling of "Qiaodan," which is the pinyin (phonetic spelling) of the Chinese characters, and rejected his claims in this regard.</p>
<p>The SPC in April started an open retrial of the trademark dispute cases filed by Jordan.</p>
<p>In 2012, Michael Jordan accused Qiaodan Sports, a Chinese sportswear and shoe manufacturer, of unauthorized use of his name and identity.</p>
<p>Jordan lodged an appeal to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry Commerce to revoke the trademarks in dispute, but this was rejected.</p>
<p>Later, Jordan filed lawsuits against the adjudication of the trademark authority but lost.</p>
<p>Chinese courts originally upheld the adjudication on the grounds that the Chinese translation "Qiaodan" is the translation of a common family name, and does not necessarily refer to the basketballer's name only.</p>
<p>In 2015, Jordan appealed to the SPC. The SPC accepted the appeal on the basis of the Administrative Procedural Law.</p>
<p>The SPC's ruling Thursday said both the trademark authority's adjudication and the previous court decisions against Jordan's legitimate trademark claims should also be revoked.</p>
<p>However, original court rulings regarding the pinyin part were upheld by the SPC.</p>
<p>Tao Kaiyuan, the chief justice of the trial at SPC, said the SPC believes that there is sufficient evidence to prove that "Qiaodan" as the Chinese translation for Jordan is famous in China and is familiar to the Chinese public.</p>
<p>Also, the Chinese characters "Qiaodan" are often used by Chinese public when referring to the former American basketball player, and there is already a "stable" link between the name and the specific individual, facts that entitle Jordan to protection under the Trademark Law.</p>
<p>Journalists from both domestic and overseas news organizations, representatives of the parties involved and members of the public were present at the announcement of the court ruling on Thursday.</p>
<p>The full text of the ruling will be published online. </p>
鎯宠浜嗚В鏇村闂滄柤<a href="http://www.liashop.net/lc/supreme-clothes/
">supreme 琛ｆ湇</a>璩囪▕娑堟伅鐨勬湅鍙嬶紝涓嶅Θ闂滄敞<a href="http://www.liashop.net/
">supreme 鍙扮仯灏堟珒</a>寰岀簩鐨勫牨閬撴秷鎭紝涔熷彲浠ユ坊鍔?strong style="color:red;">Line锛歍WZO</strong>閫茶鍜ㄨ銆傚叏鍫存墍鏈夋柊鍝佷綆鑷?鎶樿捣锛屾柊娆句笉鏂蜂笂鏋讹紝閫辨棩閫辨湯璩肩墿鏇存槸浜湁灏堝爆鎶樻墸鍎儬锛岄鍠滈€ｉ€ｏ紝姝ｅ搧澶波锛屾敮鎸佸皥娅冮璀夛紝7澶╅憭璩炴湡锛?澶╃劇鐞嗙敱閫€鎻涜波锛屽績鍕曪紝涓嶅琛屽嫊锛岃稌绶婁締閬歌臣鍚э紒锛?a href="http://www.liashop.net">http://www.liashop.net</a>;锛?
by qixihua
Vocabulary List
- 0
