So I was on www.memrise.com… - Feed Post by Austin5
So I was on www.memrise.com learning some vocab and it said 10,000 was "man", but on here, 10,000 is "ichiman"
Which is correct?
Which is correct?
posted by Austin5 August 29, 2014 at 11:25am
Comments 5
- 10,000 does mean "man". the ichi in "ichiman" means one x 10,000. so "niman" would be two x 10,000's or 20,000. "sanman" is 30,000 etc.August 29, 2014 at 12:18pm
- Ahhh, I see thank you!August 29, 2014 at 12:52pm
- Similar to "thousand" and "one-thousand" in English. "thousand" just explains the three zeroes, not the digits to the left of the comma.August 30, 2014 at 1:31am
- I realize it's a bit late, but to add to this topic - unlike 百 or 千, 万 by itself is "incorrect," and 一万 is the proper way to say it. I don't know how true this is in everyday speech/writing in Japan, but two of my Japanese professors and my textbook all agreed that 一万 was the correct way to say it.August 31, 2014 at 10:47am
- I've known this is the case for a long time, however I thought it might be interesting tonight to actually find out the reason why it's not just "man" but always "ichiman" for 10,000. I spent quite a while searching for the answer, but I didn't find anywhere that mentioned it.
I thought of a few things though:
・万 has other meanings besides its number, but 百 and 千 have only their number as their meaning. Other meanings of 万 are "myriad" (myriad is a word meaning 10,000 anyway) and "everything, all".
・万 can be used on its own as an adverb or prefix meaning "many, all", however this is pronounced "ばん".
・There is a prefix pronounced まん (満) in Japanese, but there isn't a prefix pronounced either ひゃく and せん. The kanji 万 is supposed to have been created as a simplification of 満. 満 means "full, whole".
So there's a lot more to the kanji used for 10,000, but I'm not sure which or if any of those points are the reason why it must be "ichiman" not just "man". I think it's possible that the idea of a myriad gets used for meaning things over than the literal number 10,000, so it needs to be said in a more specific way when you really do mean the actual number. I talked too long but I find this kind of stuff interesting. :P
Anyone know the actual reason? ^^August 31, 2014 at 12:56pm