a couple of questions/comments on this site
so far this site has been pretty fun: been using it for a day, almost finished with the level 1 lessons, and almost level 2 in exp, but i've a few questions and comments:
1) in the kanji testing of lessons, they use compound kanji where they combine new kanji with kanji that were not taught yet, and then test you on the differences between these. for example, they each you what 下 means, but then test you on compounds like 地下鉄 and 地下一階, and asks you to distinguish between those two (in pronunciation and meaning), when they haven't yet taught the meanings or pronunciations or the meanings of those other kanji yet. this seems a bit unfair, doesn't it? i would prefer if compounds only used kanji previously introduced. i know that's difficult, but that is generally how other kanji-learning systems tend to do it (at least from what i've seen on books and other sites). most of the time what i'm having trouble with are compounds that use kanji that i wasn't taught yet (my 'weak' list is mainly composed of that right now).
2) why are only 1456 kanji taught on the site, instead of 2000+ like with other systems? even kanjidamage, which specifically removes the kanji that are rarely seen, has around 1700. this seems a relatively small number. i've heard that to be literate in japanese, you need at least 2500 kanji, so 1456 seems limiting. i think i read somewhere in these forums that this site is planning on adding more later on, but the site has existed for about two or three years, and hasn't yet reached the full number of kanji. there are members with millions of experience points, and those members are probably limited by not being able to test themselves on all the kanji they need.
3) similarly, vocabulary is limited to around 1700, when the average functional vocabulary to learn a new language is around 10,000 to 30,000 words. the average native english speaker knows about 30,000 to 50,000 english words for example. 1700 seems very limiting. i would find this site a lot more useful if it had more than this. perhaps not having recorded pronunciations of so many words is a limiting factor (it costs money to have to pay someone to say all of those words), but couldn't they be added without pronunciation? i'd find the site a lot more useful with more than 1700 vocabulary -- even simple nintendo DS games like 'my japanese coach' has 10,000. so far this and the kanji number are my biggest complaints about the site, i feel like the potential of this site is limited by having such a small amount to learn. which is a pity because i love the idea and structure of the site better than any other site i've tried. but if i go to a site like memrise or use a program like anki and use pre-made anki decks, they have far larger kanji and vocabulary lists (and it's customizable), even though those aren't as fun to use.
4) the 'readings' part is hard to search through; there's no way to search for particular types of readings, just broad categories with a large number of pages. the readings are also not organized by difficulty level (it'd probably be a good idea to have a way to order them by new vocabulary size, with the ones that have the least new vocabulary ordered first). i think that limits this site too. by comparison, lingq's readings system is organized much better, and has more categories. i'd suggest looking at that site's japanese section for ideas on how to improve the 'readings' part of this site, because right now i don't see any advantage to using 'readings' here vs using it there instead.
5) i saw that this site is under-funded -- the donations don't even cover the server costs, and there's no paid version of the site. what i'd suggest is setting up a voluntary 'patreon' thing where people can automatically donate $1 a month or something if they wish. that would help pay for the servers and encourage future growth of the site.
6) some of the kanji compounds are missing meanings. this seems like more of a small oversight, but if i go to my 'weak' page and the kanji section of it, a lot of the compounds have no meanings listed. it's hard enough to memorize kanji compounds that have kanji that were not yet taught, but i also have to figure out the meanings of these compounds even though they aren't given? this seems almost cruel! for example, it gives me this compound to memorize: 午後四時半 -- but there's no meaning there! i can't even look it up in the dictionary, it's not there. so why is it asking me to memorize something and it doesn't tell me what it means? i can sort of deduce that it means 4:30 meal if i look up each kanji, but nowhere is that indicated on the site.
other than these problems, i love the site, so thanks for making it! i think it's a good start with lots of potential, and with some improvement could be one of the best sites for learning japanese.
1) in the kanji testing of lessons, they use compound kanji where they combine new kanji with kanji that were not taught yet, and then test you on the differences between these. for example, they each you what 下 means, but then test you on compounds like 地下鉄 and 地下一階, and asks you to distinguish between those two (in pronunciation and meaning), when they haven't yet taught the meanings or pronunciations or the meanings of those other kanji yet. this seems a bit unfair, doesn't it? i would prefer if compounds only used kanji previously introduced. i know that's difficult, but that is generally how other kanji-learning systems tend to do it (at least from what i've seen on books and other sites). most of the time what i'm having trouble with are compounds that use kanji that i wasn't taught yet (my 'weak' list is mainly composed of that right now).
2) why are only 1456 kanji taught on the site, instead of 2000+ like with other systems? even kanjidamage, which specifically removes the kanji that are rarely seen, has around 1700. this seems a relatively small number. i've heard that to be literate in japanese, you need at least 2500 kanji, so 1456 seems limiting. i think i read somewhere in these forums that this site is planning on adding more later on, but the site has existed for about two or three years, and hasn't yet reached the full number of kanji. there are members with millions of experience points, and those members are probably limited by not being able to test themselves on all the kanji they need.
3) similarly, vocabulary is limited to around 1700, when the average functional vocabulary to learn a new language is around 10,000 to 30,000 words. the average native english speaker knows about 30,000 to 50,000 english words for example. 1700 seems very limiting. i would find this site a lot more useful if it had more than this. perhaps not having recorded pronunciations of so many words is a limiting factor (it costs money to have to pay someone to say all of those words), but couldn't they be added without pronunciation? i'd find the site a lot more useful with more than 1700 vocabulary -- even simple nintendo DS games like 'my japanese coach' has 10,000. so far this and the kanji number are my biggest complaints about the site, i feel like the potential of this site is limited by having such a small amount to learn. which is a pity because i love the idea and structure of the site better than any other site i've tried. but if i go to a site like memrise or use a program like anki and use pre-made anki decks, they have far larger kanji and vocabulary lists (and it's customizable), even though those aren't as fun to use.
4) the 'readings' part is hard to search through; there's no way to search for particular types of readings, just broad categories with a large number of pages. the readings are also not organized by difficulty level (it'd probably be a good idea to have a way to order them by new vocabulary size, with the ones that have the least new vocabulary ordered first). i think that limits this site too. by comparison, lingq's readings system is organized much better, and has more categories. i'd suggest looking at that site's japanese section for ideas on how to improve the 'readings' part of this site, because right now i don't see any advantage to using 'readings' here vs using it there instead.
5) i saw that this site is under-funded -- the donations don't even cover the server costs, and there's no paid version of the site. what i'd suggest is setting up a voluntary 'patreon' thing where people can automatically donate $1 a month or something if they wish. that would help pay for the servers and encourage future growth of the site.
6) some of the kanji compounds are missing meanings. this seems like more of a small oversight, but if i go to my 'weak' page and the kanji section of it, a lot of the compounds have no meanings listed. it's hard enough to memorize kanji compounds that have kanji that were not yet taught, but i also have to figure out the meanings of these compounds even though they aren't given? this seems almost cruel! for example, it gives me this compound to memorize: 午後四時半 -- but there's no meaning there! i can't even look it up in the dictionary, it's not there. so why is it asking me to memorize something and it doesn't tell me what it means? i can sort of deduce that it means 4:30 meal if i look up each kanji, but nowhere is that indicated on the site.
other than these problems, i love the site, so thanks for making it! i think it's a good start with lots of potential, and with some improvement could be one of the best sites for learning japanese.
posted by rinkuhero